Tune in to the Shorts
No more regulations. Just listen to the short sellers.
Would the ghastly global economic crisis been avoided had the regulators listened to the short sellers? Seems likely.
In July, Christopher Cox, chairman of the SEC announced a plan to curb improper (naked) short-selling to limit the activity of short-sellers. Mr Cox seems to be implicitly blaming the shorts for the unprecedented fall of bank, government-sponsored agency and brokerage stocks over the past year – even though they were the very group that warned of the dangerous credit cycle and its consequences.
Now for a little history on shorts. Perhaps the first case dates to 1609 when the Dutch trader, Isaac Le Maire, targeted the shares of the shipping company Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie (the Dutch East India Company). VOC was the first multinational corporation in history and had broad powers. Nonetheless, Le Maire, concerned about threats of attack by English ships, sold VOC’s shares short. After learning about Le Maire’s tactics, the stock exchange governing VOC’s trading banned short-selling (although the ban was later revoked).
In the early 1630s, the Dutch economy fell into a depression following a speculative peak in the trading of tulips. Again, short-selling raised the ire of regulators, many of whom saw it as magnifying the effect on the Dutch economic downturn. As a result, England banned short-selling outright.
Hedge fund manager Douglas Kass thinks instead of more regulation, the chairman and investors should begin listening to what short-sellers have to say about our economy and credit markets.
What do you think?
.
Labels: Regulator dilemma, SEC, Short Selling
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home